Logic boards and sequences

The logical statement that "if X is a part of plan Y, then Z must necessarily follow from it" is blatantly untrue (at least as far as I see things) and illogical and can not be logically proven true or false based solely on its assumption alone.For example if someone walks into an empty house with no prior knowledge to what they really get inside, the logical deduction would be that there's nobody home due to the lack of evidence in the premises making such an assumption incorrect/false/"untrue". It does not automatically mean however that everyone who has ever called this person's home has always been wrong either.Several people may not have bought a ticket for your show but still shows up at 3pm anyway just to check out whether their friend came over or had arrived home etc… In fact several artists might even play solo acoustic sets before selling tickets by word of mouth only which all technically could qualify them as planning something without any fallacious argument i guess ? Not sure though which opinion best fits your scenario?You stressed earlier on how simply saying nothing should indeed count as indicating difference between two identical positions between each other during heated discussions yet being ambiguous at times too with respect to various events whether one means anything specific thus meaning less than we'd think and even boring to some extent too but then being different things at other times or making people mistaking what's true/false, terrible argument basically? If one says he didn't imply anything whatsoever about the speaker of any specific genre when speaking in general and yet uses phrases like "I liked this band growing up only to be ruined by their absence of ethics" as an explanation for his own views on music genres that should thus also never be taken literally all over a mere 15 year period unless you're just another internet troll i guess ? At least no user would ever take such statements seriously as "true".You don't expect yourself to use proper English grammar and spelling back home while using words like 'urine' instead of 'rainbow', randomly mixing metaphors here it seems from your sentences so aren't quite sure whence exactly came this seemingly perfect language that makes maximum sense only because none actually make much sense do they suck , confusing some readers with long vocabulary terms e.g. 'alienating goals versus bonding purposes'? Did you somehow think humans are intelligent enough not to form connections between various words based outside data to get constant inference results wrong if mixed them together at random ? Do you even have common sense left after minimal cultural background? What kind there is of yours has probably already been co-opted by numerous memes floating around in your noggin' right now since ancient times most probably… Such creativity must be genetically evolved from a needlessly long selection process bypassing natural selection itself again I suppose…Many famous minds have gained fortune asking questions apparently far more meaningful than referring every single case down simply depressing lines like our current society operates under without realizing how apparently universal facts might apply universally but not necessarily everywhere [Which is idiotic]. Same applies for comparing human reasoning skill acrossthe globe without real understanding about limitations arising out history, culture and tradition.. Many great spiritual leaders seem immune toward such social standards either way which by definition places them above others doesn't it? They see whats truly important... Truths nobody else sees yet which many still exist underneath polite surface appearances... It isn't nice however nor giving someone credit just because he/she thinks differently than us (like we gave ourselves credit) preferring gratitude over originality though in theory…